[Bug libstdc++/108568] [13 Regression] FAILs in 17_intro/names.cc

2023-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/108568] [13 Regression] FAILs in 17_intro/names.cc

2023-01-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108568 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:815e5740162d2d0b7b54031f72c201065016d58c commit r13-5461-g815e5740162d2d0b7b54031f72c201065016d58c Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: F

[Bug libstdc++/108568] [13 Regression] FAILs in 17_intro/names.cc

2023-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108568 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Except that it doesn't work either, because even the __GLIBC__ and __GLIBC_MINOR__ macros are defined in glibc headers. --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/names.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/na

[Bug libstdc++/108568] [13 Regression] FAILs in 17_intro/names.cc

2023-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108568 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I've unpacked the glibc 1.09.1 tarball and there isn't a single reference to __unused, so I think just the simpler version is enough.

[Bug libstdc++/108568] [13 Regression] FAILs in 17_intro/names.cc

2023-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108568 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Summary|FAILs in 17_int