https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
commit r13-7335-g7fb7d49b3c7129fa8a6b500f260abc642929361b
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a835f046cdf017b9e8ad5576df4f10daaf8420d0
commit r14-793-ga835f046cdf017b9e8ad5576df4f10daaf8420d0
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
First, I want to remark that inside lto_output_toplevel_asms,
lto_stream_offload_p is true even with -flto.
However, the following is for output_symtab:
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Not
--- gcc/lto-cgraph.cc 2023-01-09 13:30:47.105343886 +0100
+++ gcc/lto-cgraph.cc 2023-05-11 23:05:54.266991677 +0200
@@ -1023,7 +1023,8 @@ output_symtab (void)
if (!asm_nodes_output)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> The above can work only if toplevel asms are in separate section and so
> inputting it or not doesn't affect input of other data.
> I think it would be better
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > And we emit all toplevel asms into the offloading target code?
> > Or how does it make into PTX?
>
> It seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> And we emit all toplevel asms into the offloading target code?
> Or how does it make into PTX?
It seems as if this is always written (once). Thus, the minimal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And we emit all toplevel asms into the offloading target code?
Or how does it make into PTX?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Then _GLIBCXX_SYMVER_GNU should not be defined for NVPTX
It isn't – but with offloading, we only parse the file once — and then only
later generate for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109816
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Then _GLIBCXX_SYMVER_GNU should not be defined for NVPTX
12 matches
Mail list logo
