https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Odd use case found!
Repeating my analysis from https://bugs.gentoo.org/934688 regarding a new
compilation error in antlr-cpp-4.11.1:
Here's a minimal reproducer that fails with GCC trunk, unless you use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cc38bdf093c44918edff819ae6c73d03c726b341
commit r15-1256-gcc38bdf093c44918edff819ae6c73d03c726b341
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We could even do:
/home/jwakely/gcc/15/include/c++/15.0.0/bits/hashtable.h:78:58: error: static
assertion failed: std::hash specialization is disabled; maybe the correct
header has not been included
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
And if _Check_hash_requirements is defined at namespace scope not inside
_Hashtable then the first location is much easier to read:
/home/jwakely/gcc/15/include/c++/15.0.0/bits/hashtable.h: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115420
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
10 matches
Mail list logo
