https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115514
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115514
Jiang An changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de34 at live dot cn
--- Comment #3 from Jian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115514
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The constraint on reverse_iterator::operator->() checks it for an lvalue, which
suggests nobody considered (or cared) about annoying iterators that do
something different for lvalues and rvalues.
I'm incl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115514
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #0)
> (Another difference is it only applies the resolution for C++17 onward.)
C++20 onward, I think.
