https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59e3934346f4546d7ef4fc82d300644b52bcefb0
commit r14-10546-g59e3934346f4546d7ef4fc82d300644b52bcefb0
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1066a95aa33eee2d2bd9c8324f34dedb967f338c
commit r15-2314-g1066a95aa33eee2d2bd9c8324f34dedb967f338c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
--- Comment #5 from waffl3x ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> deducing this was not part of GCC 13 so this can't be a regression.
Yeah but it can be a stdlib regression since std::bind_front existed
before, and exists in C++20,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
--- Comment #3 from waffl3x ---
I'll take a look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116038
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>A smaller reproduction without including the stdlib is:
While the original is accepted by clang, this one is rejected by clang. I have
not looked into why though.
