--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 23425
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 2 10:27:54 2005
New Revision: 106379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106379
Log:
2005-11-02 Thomas Kho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstdc++
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-02 10:29 ---
Fixed for 4.1.0.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18
07:21 ---
I see absolutely no difference between the code generated for clear1() and
clear2() on powerpc-linux-gnu. This includes the final_cleanup tree dump and
the assembly output using g++ -O2.
--
http://gcc.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-17
02:23 ---
Confirmed, there are two different issues here because it looks like the pool
allocator injects code
which initializes a variable, even though there is a different way of doing the
initialization. It sho
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
||edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-16
18:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: vector::clear should be manually inlined
>
> vector::clear calls erase(begin(), end()), which has an unnecessary call to
> memmove, in addition to a function call overhead. The fix re
--- Additional Comments From tkho at ucla dot edu 2005-08-16 18:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=9503)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9503&action=view)
change to vector::clear
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23425
