[Bug libstdc++/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex

2005-11-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 16:31 --- Hold on, in C99, complex is a scaler type so libstdc++ is using a GCC extension over what C99 requires which causes this. And my comment in #6 still holds for this bug. I think libstdc++ should rethink about this

[Bug libstdc++/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex

2005-09-12 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12 19:18 --- Agree with Gaby. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497

[Bug libstdc++/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex

2005-08-22 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-08-22 19:49 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is a bug in libstdc++ headers. Since co

[Bug libstdc++/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex

2005-08-20 Thread jan at etpmod dot phys dot tue dot nl
--- Additional Comments From jan at etpmod dot phys dot tue dot nl 2005-08-20 19:58 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I can confirm this on alphaev68-linux, even without -g. C test case: > -g should have been -Wall. Sorry about that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug libstdc++/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex

2005-08-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-20 18:27 --- This is a bug in libstdc++ headers. Since complex has been come a "scalar" and cannot be loaded piece wise. -- What|Removed |Added