--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23978
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29
17:42 ---
Subject: Bug 23978
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-29 17:42:42
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-29
18:31 ---
Subject: Bug 23978
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-29 18:30:51
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 :
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-29 18:32
---
Fixed for 4.0.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-09-22 10:49
---
Ah ha, found the problem. tuple has a copy constructor for std::pair, but not
an operator=(std::pair). It
should. I'll prepare a patch. While I'm at fixing this, there are quite a lot
of functions
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-09-20 18:31
---
This looks like a duplicate of PR 23896 -- does the patch there help you?
I.e. if you update the compiler to the latest version, does the problem
go away?
W.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-09-20 23:02
---
I'll have a closer look. I think not, as on my compiler boost::tie does work,
it's tr1::tie which doesn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23978
--- Additional Comments From chris at bubblescope dot net 2005-09-20 23:28
---
Nope, the code in PR 23896 works fine on my compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23978
