https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
>
> Did this fix things?
No, not entirely. The whole config/cpu/sh/atomicity.h header should not be
required, but because of PR 53579, it is.
Please do not close
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sun Jan 25 16:54:33 2015
New Revision: 220094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220094root=gccview=rev
Log:
libstdc++-v3/
PR target/29366
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
The patch works on a default sh-elf/newlib config -- it just uses the
single-thread fake atomics from libstdc++. Kaz, could you please
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34478
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34478action=edit
proposed workaround patch
There hasn't been any update for PR 53579. I'd like to propose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53579
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|52941 |
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29366
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-12
01:20:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think some of the problems will disappear once PR 52941 is done.
After that, and having the new atomic builtins of 4.7, we
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 18:51
---
Let's add an SH maintainer in CC...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
12 matches
Mail list logo
