--- Comment #4 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2007-05-02 00:20 ---
I accept that there is something wrong on my side. Be it "forward" or
"backward".
However, there are some things that I still do not understand.
Cmake was compiled several times with different bootstrapped gcc-4.2.0
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-01 23:41 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That is called forwards compatibility...
The name depends on the point of view ;) No, seriusly, thanks about the name, I
always get this one wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-01 23:39 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Obviously, you are linking a binary compiled with 4.2.0 to a 4.1.2 library.
> That kind of "backward" compatibility is not provided and never was in the
> past.
That is called forwards com
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-05-01 23:36 ---
Obviously, you are linking a binary compiled with 4.2.0 to a 4.1.2 library.
That kind of "backward" compatibility is not provided and never was in the
past.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Remov
