--- Comment #7 from dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 23:39
---
Subject: Bug 33578
Author: dannysmith
Date: Wed Oct 10 23:39:30 2007
New Revision: 129219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129219
Log:
PR libstdc++/33578
*
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 22:24 ---
Ah yes, this one.
I believe there is controversy around this implementation point on linux as
well.
Here's some info from previous discussions between myself, Ulrich, and
Johannes.
Me:
Include sched.h for
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 22:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=14332)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14332action=view)
Consistent use of _WIN32 define
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33578
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 22:41 ---
Actually, I think that when I added sched.h, I forgot to look at the windows
stuff. Something seems off to me, WRT the current code. The includes don't
match the code...
Here's a patch to make the conditionals in the
--- Comment #4 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-09
23:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14334)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14334action=view)
mingw32 compatibility patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33578
--- Comment #5 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-09
23:54 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created an attachment (id=14332)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14332action=view) [edit]
Consistent use of _WIN32 define
Thats not quite right.
--- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 02:00 ---
Danny, if this allows compilation of parallel_list.cc then please check your
patch in, as it doesn't change semantics.
Then we can figure out what we really want here
--
