[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 09:19 --- (In reply to comment #2) Here's my plan for the legacy hash containers: 1) port debug mode to tr1 associative containers 2) move ext/hash containers to deprecated Thoughts? Certainly, I agree with the (mid term?)

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:24 --- Subject: Bug 33633 Author: bkoz Date: Wed Oct 10 15:23:59 2007 New Revision: 129210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129210 Log: 2007-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:49 --- Fixed. Current debug mode results (ie, with make CXXFLAGS=-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG check) FAIL: 20_util/pair/moveable.cc execution test FAIL: 23_containers/deque/moveable.cc execution test FAIL:

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 15:52 --- Yes, time to fix the moveable.cc tests in debug-mode. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:36 --- The moveable.cc fails are now fixed. Otherwise, a couple of fails are also trivial 23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc 23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc _S_word_size in the wrong namespace.

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 17:56 --- Sweet, thanks. Any chance you could put in the 23_containers/vector/bool/capacity/29134.cc 23_containers/vector/bool/modifiers/insert/31370.cc fix too? My sources are in pre-deprecate mode right now... best,

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-10 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-10 17:57 --- I don't have a fix ;) Everything seems rather ugly and not worth the trouble... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-09 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 23:07 --- Here's my plan for the legacy hash containers: 1) port debug mode to tr1 associative containers 2) move ext/hash containers to deprecated Thoughts? Anyway. This issue is a macro name mix-up. Here's I'll check in

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-09 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 23:08 --- Created an attachment (id=14333) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14333action=view) EXT to EXT_D -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33633

[Bug libstdc++/33633] [4.3 Regression] -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG vs ext/hash_*

2007-10-02 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 00:37 --- I'll take a look at this. -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added