--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-10 15:45 ---
This should be fixed now. Please confirm and close.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-10
19:26 ---
Fixed.
--
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 21:01 ---
I'm going to check this in folks.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33682
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 21:24 ---
Subject: Bug 33682
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Oct 9 21:24:31 2007
New Revision: 129181
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=129181
Log:
2007-10-09 Zhou Drangon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from dkwan at transmeta dot com 2007-10-07 17:55 ---
Sorry about the breakage. I only tested the original patch on Linux. The
obvious patch should be fine. I am not familiar with mingw-w64. Does it
provide a similar conditional variable as POSIX? If so, another way to
--- Comment #1 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-10-06
21:53 ---
The 'obvious' patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2007-10/msg00043.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33682
