--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-14 15:40 ---
*** Bug 33983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-27 11:24 ---
*** Bug 34597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-27 11:33 ---
Ok, I'm fixing this issue, is bothering too many people...
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-27 13:00 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-27 11:54 ---
You are right. Actually, I'm under the impression that we should do quite a bit
of work to update the whole system_error to the current working draft. But
Benjamin probably wants to take care of that, I'm just going to
--- Comment #5 from sylvain dot pion at sophia dot inria dot fr 2007-12-27
11:36 ---
Thank you Paolo,
Looking at the current workding draft N2461, the protecting namespace
is already there. So maybe the problem has already been dealt with
independently, and issue 697 has been
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-27 12:59 ---
Subject: Bug 34538
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Dec 27 12:59:01 2007
New Revision: 131200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131200
Log:
2007-12-27 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-12-20 17:44 ---
This is a known issue:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#697
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rbuergel at web dot de 2007-12-20 18:30 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a known issue:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#697
Ooops. I only looked in the gcc bug database. Probably i should expand my
research before filing a bug
