http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35569
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anthony.ajw at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35569
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martinhaefner at web dot de
--- Comment
--- Comment #12 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 00:54 ---
Fixed for 4.5.0
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #11 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 00:54 ---
Subject: Bug 35569
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 12 00:53:30 2010
New Revision: 155826
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155826
Log:
2010-01-12 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/24803
--- Comment #10 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-11 14:05 ---
Sorry for the lack of progress, I'll take another crack at it this week and
report back on what I've got and what doesn't work. If I can't finish it I'll
say so and unassign myself from this PR
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-11 13:19
---
Jon, do you have any updated plans about this and related issues? I think it
would be nice if we could make progress on the C++0x for 4.5.0...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
Wh
--- Comment #8 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-06-05 12:48
---
I've got std::bind and friends working with rvalues, but bug 34022 means that
ugly workarounds are needed to work with rvalues of scalar types. When Core DR
664 is ready and bug 34022 is fixed that won't be neces
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2009-01-18 03:58 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Maybe this issue isn't sufficiently clarified in the audit. Unless I'm badly
> mistaken (Jon, Chris will correct me), this is not a bug for a C++03 + TR1
> bind
> (indeed the testcases provide
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-17 09:04
---
Maybe this issue isn't sufficiently clarified in the audit. Unless I'm badly
mistaken (Jon, Chris will correct me), this is not a bug for a C++03 + TR1 bind
(indeed the testcases provided by Doug are rather cle
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2009-01-17 01:41 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'm seeing the same thing with Boost.Bind (boost 1.37, GCC 4.2.1).
boost.bind appears to work just fine for me, though!?
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35569
--- Comment #4 from cfairles at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-17 00:03
---
*** Bug 38889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
cfairles at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-01-15 11:44
---
I'm working on adding rvalue support to bind etc. but time is not on my side
recently. I hope to make some more progress this weekend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35569
--- Comment #2 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-01-14 19:20 ---
I'm seeing the same thing with Boost.Bind (boost 1.37, GCC 4.2.1).
#include
#include
using boost::bind;
using std::multiplies;
int main() {
// Fine.
int const lvalue = 5;
bind(multiplies(),4,_1)(lvalu
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-11-24 14:55
---
*** Bug 38238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
16 matches
Mail list logo
