--- Comment #19 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 22:40
---
fixed for 4.4
--
jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #18 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 22:34 ---
Subject: Bug 36962
Author: redi
Date: Thu Sep 4 22:33:10 2008
New Revision: 140012
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140012
Log:
PR libstdc++/36962
* include/Makefile.am: Update h
--- Comment #17 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 21:39
---
Created an attachment (id=16226)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16226&action=view)
new patch
As requested, except I didn't split tr1_impl/boost_sp_counted_base.h
My preference would be to l
--- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-04 14:00
---
Great, thanks a lot again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--- Comment #15 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 13:52
---
Sure, I can do that
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-04 09:12
---
Jonathan, while we are at it, can we also unify tr1/boost_sp_shared_count.h and
tr1/boost_shared_ptr.h, likewise for bits/boost_sp_shared_count.h and
bits/boost_shared_ptr.h?
Moreover, for the sake of clarity
--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-04 01:11
---
Great Jonathan. Tomorrow I'll regtest it again on machines and likely commit
it.
Well, consider also posting the patch to the mailing list...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--- Comment #12 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 23:43
---
Created an attachment (id=16216)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16216&action=view)
updated patch
this replaces tr1_impl/boost_shared_ptr.h with separate files in tr1/ and bits/
as well as im
--- Comment #11 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 15:08
---
Yes, the problem is with result_of, not my changes to shared_ptr. It will work
with unique_ptr if a type D::result_type exists, so I'll submit the new
patch tonight.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-03 15:04
---
Sure, no problem. Let's just do the split and implement as much as the
unique_ptr changes as possible. If then updating result_of for C++0x is enough,
everything is perfectly fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #9 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 15:00
---
I have another patch ready for this, but it doesn't work with unique_ptr
where D is a reference type, due to Bug 37351
e.g. constructing from unique_ptr&> fails to compile
because std::reference_wrapper>::operat
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-05 19:26
---
Excellent. Thanks a lot again, Jonathan.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-08-05 19:06
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hi again. I have essentially only one substantive comment: can you double
> check
> the implementation is correct vs 20.7.12.2.1/37 ?
I believe the use of std::ref was to make the D pa
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-31 11:03
---
By the way, I'm under the impression that the differences between the TR1 and
the C++0x versions are by now too many, way too many macros. At some point we
should byte the bullet and separate completely for a g
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-31 08:59
---
Hi again. I have essentially only one substantive comment: can you double check
the implementation is correct vs 20.7.12.2.1/37 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-30 21:49
---
Many thanks Jonathan! By the time you will be back online, my comments will be
ready and in any case will be able to commit the changes! Thanks again, Paolo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-07-30 21:27
---
Created an attachment (id=15979)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15979&action=view)
unique_ptr and rvalue-reference updates from WP
I'm going to be offline until next week so here's what I hav
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-29 19:28
---
Ok, Jonathan. You are the share_ptr expert here, I'll wait for you until, say,
middle of August, then will go ahead myself, it seems a small task.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--- Comment #1 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-07-29 19:24
---
I will try to look at it next week some time, but don't have much spare time in
the near future, so don't hold your breath for me to do it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36962
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
20 matches
Mail list logo
