[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2024-03-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:afefe951acd8bae13be0e1b700262316254ce935 commit r12-10278-gafefe951acd8bae13be0e1b700262316254ce935 Author: Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2023-05-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|bkoz at gcc dot g

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2023-04-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bd8a81f39e084d43c6701afb6203510b5fe69a2 commit r13-7264-g7bd8a81f39e084d43c6701afb6203510b5fe69a2 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2023-04-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Grr, I've just noticed that classes defined in a header with no file extension do not get an implicit @headerfile, the way that classes defined in a foo.h header do. See https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/i

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2023-04-27 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Added some more of these @headerfile annotations, but there's still more to do.

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2023-04-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:865869dc6943eb5dee855bc1ea88b09b7dabc641 commit r14-290-g865869dc6943eb5dee855bc1ea88b09b7dabc641 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2021-07-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- My doxygen patch was merged, so we can start to use SHOW_HEADERFILE and @headerfile to do this.

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2021-07-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- If we do this for each class: @class unique_ptr memory and enable SHOW_INCLUDE_FILES=YES in the doxygen config, then we get this in the docs for unique_ptr: #include It also seems to avoid the doxygen

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2018-11-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Busg like this make me wonder if we wouldn't be better simply replacing our Doxygen API docs with a link to cppreference.com which is far more complete and has better formatting and cross referencing.

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2012-05-02 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2009-06-17 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 00:34 --- Add documentation keyword -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywo

[Bug libstdc++/40380] class documentation should mention include file to use

2009-06-17 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-18 00:00 --- Agreed. Thanks for the feedback on docs. Will put this on the docs todo list. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40380