[Bug libstdc++/40826] [C++0x] atomic_flag_{test_and_set,clear}_explicit() are apparently broken

2009-10-19 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-19 16:47 --- Fixed on trunk and gcc-4_4-branch -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/40826] [C++0x] atomic_flag_{test_and_set,clear}_explicit() are apparently broken

2009-10-17 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-18 03:20 --- Mine. -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/40826] [C++0x] atomic_flag_{test_and_set,clear}_explicit() are apparently broken

2009-10-17 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-18 03:30 --- Subject: Bug 40826 Author: bkoz Date: Sun Oct 18 03:30:03 2009 New Revision: 152965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152965 Log: 2009-10-16 Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com *

[Bug libstdc++/40826] [C++0x] atomic_flag_{test_and_set,clear}_explicit() are apparently broken

2009-10-16 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16 07:47 --- Subject: Bug 40826 Author: bkoz Date: Fri Oct 16 07:47:33 2009 New Revision: 152895 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=152895 Log: 2009-10-15 Benjamin Kosnik b...@redhat.com PR

[Bug libstdc++/40826] [C++0x] atomic_flag_{test_and_set,clear}_explicit() are apparently broken

2009-07-22 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-22 14:23 --- Maybe CC Benjamin about this one too... Note, as I very often repeat, things in C++0x headers are experimental, part of an ongoing effort, no guarantees, no promises of conformance, etc... -- paolo dot