subject:"\[Bug libstdc\+\+\/43622\] no C\+\+ typeinfo for __float128 and _

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2014-03-02 Thread pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Paul A. Bristow pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pbristow

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2014-03-02 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- It looks like emit_support_tinfos (rtti.c) should go through registered_builtin_types (hidden in c-common.c) in addition to the hardcoded fundamentals list.

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2012-10-21 Thread planet36 at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #11 from Steve Ward planet36 at gmail dot com 2012-10-21 22:05:35 UTC --- This problem still exists in g++ 4.7.2.

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-09-25 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.1 |---

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-04-14 Thread planet36 at gmail dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #9 from Steve Ward planet36 at gmail dot com 2011-04-14 15:56:12 UTC --- Created attachment 23982 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23982 This test-case shows how typeinfo for non-complex 128-bit types DOES NOT work,

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-03-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.6.1 ---

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-02-24 15:23:33 UTC --- This seems related to bug 40855. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00652.html and the rest of that thread.

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-24 18:53:08 UTC --- Expecting this as exported as fundamental_type_info, see in emit_support_tinfos via rtti.c:1461: static tree *const fundamentals[] = {

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-24 18:54:06 UTC --- Created attachment 23457 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23457 typeinfo exports for float128

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-24 19:09:33 UTC --- RE comment 2. Yes, agreed full support is a ways off. However, typeinfo support is ostensibly already there, just not emitted. This is a bug, and not

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for float128 and int128

2011-02-24 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-24 19:28:02 UTC --- ack, I mis-read rtti.c, these are the decimal exports, ie decimal128 not float128. Jakub you are correct these are exports as LD symbols via ld versioning