https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e4e3ffd10f53ef71696bc728ab40258751a2df4
commit r13-3707-g4e4e3ffd10f53ef71696bc728ab40258751a2df4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> 27.4 [iostream.objects] paragraph 2
> The results of including in a translation unit shall be as if
> defined an instance of ios_base::Init with static sto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
--- Comment #14 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 09:39
---
Well, it might be easy to modify libstdc++ implementation so the static
constructor compiles into single function call. Then we can teach GCC to
optimize constructor containing only a call into entry in ctors tabl
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 11:41 ---
So reopening for this enhancement...
Another alternative would be some .init.first array or something similar which
would contain pointers to functions to be run as early constructors and linker
would remove duplicat
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-22 11:25
---
The same idea vaguely occurred to me...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 11:03 ---
Perhaps with LTO we could special case this (perhaps using some special
attribute) and only construct/destruct the first of these
static ios_base::Init __ioinit;
vars and optimize all the others away together with t
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 00:01
---
The C++ standard actually requires this as noted in comment #5.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-07-15 18:26
---
Let's say we remove that horrible .h from the Summary, since, to be fair,
didn't exist in g.C in the first place ;)
That said, I agree with Jon, by and large, with the following minor additional
observations:
11 matches
Mail list logo
