http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Zholos 2011-03-16
22:43:45 UTC ---
Good idea. The testcases should be adapted to the code paths in the GCC
generators though: for instance, binomial with p > .5 isn't covered there.
And BINS should be increased: for in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-16
18:23:46 UTC ---
For the time being at least, for testing I think I'm going to adapt the code in
the GNU GSL, it's pretty simple (see randist/test.c) but at least we are 100%
safe from the licensing p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #14 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-14 18:10:47 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 14 18:10:36 2011
New Revision: 170950
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170950
Log:
2011-03-14 Andrey Zholos
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-14
18:20:33 UTC ---
Jakub thanks for reminding me, luckily I noticed your message to the mailing
list announcing the branching. Anyway, I went ahead and applied both fixes to
4_6 too, if you want me to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #16 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-14 18:17:55 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 14 18:17:51 2011
New Revision: 170951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170951
Log:
2011-03-14 Andrey Zholos
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-14
18:08:35 UTC ---
Good idea, yes, something like that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #12 from Andrey Zholos 2011-03-14
18:07:22 UTC ---
The double __p also fixes an infinite (maybe) loop in both
binomial_distribution(100, .75) and binomial_distribution(100, .25)
when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_MATH_TR1 is defined.
I guess th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-14
18:02:41 UTC ---
In 4_5-branch I'm going to fix only the first issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-14 17:57:53 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 14 17:57:48 2011
New Revision: 170946
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170946
Log:
2011-03-14 Andrey Zholos
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-14
17:43:33 UTC ---
Yes, but really I'd like to have something quite serious in terms of testing,
for 4.7.0 at this point. I even have some half-baked code around. By the way,
if you are interested in con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48114
--- Comment #8 from Andrey Zholos 2011-03-14 17:34:01
UTC ---
Ah, yes, I only looked at the C++0x formulas.
By the way, testcases for these don't need to sample probabilities.
They can just check, say, the first 100 values drawn using a
determin
13 matches
Mail list logo
