http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kreckel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #29 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-04-29
23:24:19 UTC ---
This is now fixed in 4_6-branch too in C++03 mode, not in C++0x mode, where we
would need list-initialization of __complex__. If people believe we can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #28 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-29 23:20:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Apr 29 23:19:59 2011
New Revision: 173195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=173195
Log:
2011-04-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #30 from Gabriel Dos Reis gdr at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-29
23:52:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
This is now fixed in 4_6-branch too in C++03 mode, not in C++0x mode, where we
would need list-initialization of __complex__. If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 / 4.7 Regression] |[4.6
