http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
Sergei Trofimovich slyfox at inbox dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich slyfox at inbox dot ru 2011-12-30
18:51:35 UTC ---
Just for reference. Proposed fix in glibc:
http://old.nabble.com/-patch--handle-unaligned-arm-abs-relocs-td32964712.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #5 from junkmailnotread at yahoo dot com 2011-12-08 23:46:37 UTC ---
The problem is also present with glibc-2.13
Thanks for the PDF reference. If R_ARM_ABS32 has no alignment requirement then
this must be a glibc bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:43:26 UTC ---
What version of glibc are you using? glibc should be handling the unaligned
relocation correctly. Also GCC is correct here in using the unaligned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-07
19:44:09 UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2005-07/msg00325.html for a problem against
MIPS for the same unaligned relocation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #3 from junkmailnotread at yahoo dot com 2011-12-07 20:31:02 UTC ---
I'm using glibc-2.12.2
