[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-10-01 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-10-01 23:43:25 UTC --- Can we close this now? I think we figured out that wasn't a C++ library-proper issue, instead a fixincludes issue, but I don't understand whether

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-10-01 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #9 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-02 01:08:00 UTC --- Paolo: This was wrapped up with several other fixincludes patches with regards to vxWorks, and Bruce Korb has approved the set and has agreed to commit. However,

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-06-25 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #7 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-06-25 18:23:02 UTC --- Fixed with this (approved, but not committed) patch series: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00382.html

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-24 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #5 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-24 20:39:20 UTC --- Would something like the following fixincludes hacks work? /* * Wrap VxWorks ioctl to keep everything pretty */ fix = { hackname= vxworks_ioctl_macro; files

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-24 22:17:15 UTC --- I think you should post your ongoing work on the mailing lists (gcc-patches and CC libstdc++)

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #3 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-05-23 13:13:16 UTC --- I don't know much about fixincludes, but it *seems* to me like it could be done with fixincludes. I don't know how to get fixincludes to do that, though. Also, sorry for the

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-23 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-23 13:47:49 UTC --- Then, please investigate that possibility, maybe ask for help on the mailing list too, in principle I consider it a better solution.

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rbmj at verizon dot net | ---

[Bug libstdc++/53457] Accommodate non-compliant ioctl() on VxWorks

2012-05-22 Thread rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457 rbmj at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbmj at verizon dot net ---