http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53648
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53648
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-14
22:07:37 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 14 22:07:33 2012
New Revision: 188636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=188636
Log:
PR libstdc++/53648
* include/std/tuple (__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53648
--- Comment #4 from chesstr at hotmail dot com 2012-06-12 18:03:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> There are other cases involving non-empty tuples that will still result in an
> ambiguity e.g.
>
> struct A { };
> auto d = tuple, A>, A>{};
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53648
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-06-12
17:27:50 UTC ---
There are other cases involving non-empty tuples that will still result in an
ambiguity e.g.
struct A { };
auto d = tuple, A>, A>{};
My solution avoids using the EBO for some condi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53648
--- Comment #2 from chesstr at hotmail dot com 2012-06-12 17:13:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have a fix for this already, IIRC it's simply a case of not using the EBO
> for
> a tuple that contains std::tuple<>
Yes, an easy fix in tuple
