http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-10-09 15:05:31 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Drepper
> 2012-10-09 11:23:41 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #0)
>> The new ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-09 14:50:31 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 9 14:50:19 2012
New Revision: 192256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192256
Log:
2012-10-09 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-09
11:44:09 UTC ---
Boy, nobody cites me like that, at least, not while I'm still alive.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-09
11:39:17 UTC ---
As Nathan Froyd said at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00772.html
"Please try to consider what's best for all the people who use GCC, not just
the cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-10-09
11:35:19 UTC ---
> ... I don't have access to any big endian machines
> and therefore didn't even try to make it work.
AFAICT there are big endian machines in the CompileFarm (see
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-09
11:28:45 UTC ---
Ok, thanks, I missed that remark of yours. Well, at present nothing prevents
people with big endian machines to try to use the code, and we unconditionally
run the testsuite. Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #4 from Ulrich Drepper 2012-10-09
11:23:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The new ext/random/simd_fast_mersenne_twister_engine/cons/default.cc testcase
> FAILs on Solaris/SPARC (both 32 and 64-bit):
That's expected. I m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-09
10:20:45 UTC ---
Can also be something even more trivial, because I bet we didn't exercise much
the codepath for __SSE2__ undefined before committing the code.
Actually - and this is a questio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-*-solaris2* |sparc*-*-solaris2*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54869
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-09
09:49:08 UTC ---
Guys, I don't have Sparc-Solaris machines and didn't design the testcase. To be
honest, I didn't even realize so far that this simd_* variant was meant for
other targets besides
11 matches
Mail list logo
