http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #7 from Tim Janik timj at gtk dot org 2013-01-28 01:13:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Debug Mode even catches it:
unordered_map:max_size: 576460752303423487
unordered_map:size: 10352716
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-28
01:29:11 UTC ---
I think there are extra debug checks in unordered_map on the GCC trunk that
aren't in the 4.7 release.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-09
11:38:03 UTC ---
Important note: I can reproduce the Segmentation fault way back to 4_5-branch,
in other terms, whatever it is, happened also with the old
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09
12:15:39 UTC ---
This is invalid if size() bucket_count(), which is very likely:
for (size_t i = 0; i umap.size(); i++)
{
const size_t bs =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55911
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-09
14:47:12 UTC ---
Thanks Jon.
