[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #18 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-13 21:58:57 UTC --- Author: glisse Date: Wed Feb 13 21:58:53 2013 New Revision: 196034 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196034 Log: 2013-02-13 Marc

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-02-12 16:59:39 UTC --- Jakub, if Marc remains unreachable I'll take care of carefully checking and committing the patch in #c9 first thing tomorrow.

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-12 20:55:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) Marc, any news on this? I landed less than 2 hours ago... I'll see if I can handle it tomorrow.

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09 18:42:48 UTC --- Given this is now P1, could the #c9 patch be committed soon, and perhaps just defer a testcase for it when Marc returns?

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 12:53:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29315 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29315 #undef complex only if complex is included Completely untested patch

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-31 12:57:46 UTC --- Just to confirm that I like this sort of change. Thanks Marc.

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 13:05:52 UTC --- Yeah, looks nice.

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-31 16:53:42 UTC --- Ok, I'll add a testcase and test the patch in a couple weeks if nobody beats me to it (I am leaving tonight).

[Bug libstdc++/56111] [4.8 Regression] {float,double,long double} complex not accepted anymore

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56111 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-31 16:59:52 UTC --- Great, thanks.