https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56257
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56257
--- Comment #3 from Wolfgang Bangerth bangerth at gmail dot com 2013-02-09
21:37:55 UTC ---
:-) Sure, and of course I did tell him don't do that. In essence it's a
question of how easy it is to shoot yourself in the foot by exposing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56257
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09
01:57:32 UTC ---
How about don't do that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56257
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-09
02:01:21 UTC ---
To be specific, of course using a name like _M_impl doesn't lead to portable
code ... that's kinda the point of reserved names. We use them for our own
