http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure this is not a clang issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
--- Comment #2 from Olivier Parcollet ---
I am not sure.
If I understood correctly, clang is stricter on this sort of issue than gcc,
but I do not know what the standard says.
A minimal version of such code is (from hashtable.h) :
#include
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.9.0
Target Milestone|---