https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keith.marshall at mailinator
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Nov 13 14:51:25 2015
New Revision: 230324
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230324&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
More fine-grained autoconf checks for C99 library
2015-11-13 Jennifer Y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The problem in this case is that newlib only defines C99 functions for C99 or
C++11, but the _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 tests in acinclude.m4 are compiled with
-std=gnu++98.
As discussed previously (on the mailing l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This is similar to PR 58393, it's due to using a single _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 macro
instead of more fine-grained tests for specific features.
