[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2020-10-11 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- > Looks like this is still failing for solaris 11: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-October/610818.html True. However, t

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2020-10-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i386-pc-solaris2.11 CC

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-11-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Thanks for the update. I still wonder if it would be better to write the floating point values out using hexadecimal notation.

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-11-15 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #8 from Richard PALO --- As far as the test as it currently is written, I now get: >PASS: ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc (test for excess errors) >PASS: ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-09-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Aha, so that's the culprit. I really think we should be outputting in an exact format, not via conversion to/from decimal. > BTW, I did this manually as I'm not very proficient with `runtest`, isn't > ther

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-09-25 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #6 from Richard PALO --- sorry, I meant to say M_gd2._M_saved

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-09-25 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #5 from Richard PALO --- By the way, in gdb, here are the complete u and v variables after serialisation: gdb) p u $1 = {_M_param = {_M_lambda = 2, _M_mu = 1.5, _M_nu = 3}, _M_gd1 = { _M_param = {_M_alpha = 2, _M_beta = 0.5, _M_m

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-09-25 Thread richard at netbsd dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #4 from Richard PALO --- >>Could you please add -fno-access-control to the "dg-options" flags at the top >>of the file and replace the VERIFY check with the following: >>std::cout << (u._M_param._M_lambda == v._M_param._M_lambda) <<

[Bug libstdc++/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

2014-09-25 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|testsuite |libstdc++ Version|unknown