https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks reasonable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
Or drop the gnu-versioned-namespace support altogether.
I'd like to do that ... maybe for GCC 6 though. It seems a bit late now to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 23 16:47:18 2015
New Revision: 221600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221600root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64967
* acinclude.m4: Disable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I was wondering if anyone even still uses
--enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace
I don't think it is worthwhile to support the dual ABI with the versioned
namespace, since using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or drop the gnu-versioned-namespace support altogether.
Anyway, if you don't, bumping it to _8 and always using the new ABI sounds like
a good plan to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64967
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
