https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. we still return zero for the default random_device if using the RDRAND
instruction. I don't know what we could do there, except maybe trust Intel and
return the maximum value.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 23 16:11:57 2017
New Revision: 248374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248374=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/67578 Implement non-trivial std::random_device::entropy
2017-05-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> Or maybe we should keep the ABI unchanged and put all the implementation
> in the header random.h?
No. It would then pollute the global namespace with sys/ioctl.h and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67578
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryxi at stu dot xidian.edu.cn
--- Comment
