[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Oops, that was meant to be for Bug 68982

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Dec 21 13:02:12 2015 New Revision: 231879 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231879&root=gcc&view=rev Log: libstdc++/68276 consistently qualify std::forward PR libstdc++/6

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #5 from Ville Voutilainen --- The enhancement PR is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68989.

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen --- The current approach still needs to catch bad_new_array_length exceptions. That is intended to be solved by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1992 so once we get to stage 1 for g

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 --- Comment #2 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Fri Dec 18 15:17:09 2015 New Revision: 231819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231819&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-12-18 Ville Voutilainen PR libstdc++/68276

[Bug libstdc++/68276] ios_base::_M_grow_words should use new (std::nothrow)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68276 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|