[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-06-10 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-07-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Component|c++

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread tuwwcn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #2 from Wei-Wei Tu --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > Complete testcase (would it really have hurt to include the headers to make > the testcase valid?) > > #include > #include > #include > > struct Test : public

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Wei-Wei Tu from comment #2) > This is the test case Yes, I know, I already added it in comment 1 :-) Preprocessed source from gcc-5 fails, so this is due to some front-end change (either gett

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread tuwwcn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #4 from Wei-Wei Tu --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to Wei-Wei Tu from comment #2) > > This is the test case > > Yes, I know, I already added it in comment 1 :-) > > Preprocessed source from gcc-5 fails,

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I think it's valid. It started being rejected with r233719 PR c++/69842 * method.c (forward_parm): Handle parameter packs. * lambda.c (maybe_add_lambda_conv_op): Use it for th

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-04-28 Thread ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-05-11 Thread tuwwcn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #8 from Wei-Wei Tu --- Would this bug be fixed in gcc 6.1.1 or in later version?

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

2016-05-11 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- 6.1.1 is not a release, it's the current development snapshot from the gcc-6 branch. It will be fixed in a later version.