subject:"\[Bug libstdc\+\+\/85998\] feature request\: support C\+\+17 parallel STL"

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2019-05-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2019-05-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2018-05-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2018-05-30 Thread jeff.science at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Hammond --- > Finishing C++17 support in libstdc++ is already one of our top priorities for > GCC 9. There's no need to ask for it, and doing so won't affect priorities. > The missing pieces are documented: >

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2018-05-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan

[Bug libstdc++/85998] feature request: support C++17 parallel STL

2018-05-30 Thread jeff.science at gmail dot com

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85998 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Hammond --- Other projects use the existence of feature requests in their bug tracker for prioritization of development. How does GCC manage this information? How do you track GCC roadmap development if not through