https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:913312de92522e9e6696331fc3018e1020845c26
commit r10-9591-g913312de92522e9e6696331fc3018e1020845c26
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03b6ceede733d7ae33eca695c06b181b
commit r11-7603-g03b6ceede733d7ae33eca695c06b181b
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
LWG 3530 should mean we don't have to support such silly types.
https://wg21.link/lwg3530
However, we are still required to impose a total order on function pointers,
which means ranges::less/greater/less_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93628
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-04-15
Ever confirmed|0