[Bug libstdc++/96710] __int128 vs

2024-02-06 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > Of course the ideal would be for WG14 to accept > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2425.pdf and then we can > just say is_integer<__int128>

[Bug libstdc++/96710] __int128 vs

2022-05-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > Our definitions of is_scalar depends on is_arithmetic, so > is_scalar<__int128> is false, and therefore is_object<__int128> is false. > This is clearly

[Bug libstdc++/96710] __int128 vs

2020-12-10 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|