[Bug lto/41578] 7% slower runtime with -flto than without

2009-10-23 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 19:38 --- This one should just be monitored from week to week. There is so much stuff going into the trunk right now that results vary from one day to another by +5% to -5% in the last four days alone. -- steven at gcc dot

[Bug lto/41578] 7% slower runtime with -flto than without

2009-10-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 22:27 --- The bugreport is not useful in its current form anyway (no testcase). Let's close it. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/41578] 7% slower runtime with -flto than without

2009-10-06 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-06 12:14 --- (In reply to comment #1) Try enabling -fwhole-program together with -flto. I did now - and thanks to sanitizing the tree, there is no failure (contrary to using only -fwhole-program w/o -flto). capacita is now

[Bug lto/41578] 7% slower runtime with -flto than without

2009-10-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-05 13:10 --- Try enabling -fwhole-program together with -flto. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41578