--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 15:44 ---
Nothing new.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--- Comment #5 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-18 16:18
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hm, the assert doesn't trigger if I add a tem != field check. In fact I do
> not
> understand the assert you added at all ;)
I completely misunderstood the assert you asked for. The t
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-18 10:55 ---
Hm, the assert doesn't trigger if I add a tem != field check. In fact I do not
understand the assert you added at all ;) We do find the correct field, if
that ends up still being the wrong one then DECL_CONTEXT is
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 17:52 ---
I will have a looksee.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assi
--- Comment #2 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 17:05
---
Created an attachment (id=19006)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19006&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42020
--- Comment #1 from espindola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 17:05
---
Created an attachment (id=19005)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19005&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42020
