https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #12 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-09-06
13:03:17 UTC ---
I just tried Matt Hargett's patch from Bug53572 with gcc4.7.1 and it still has
not fixed the problem we're having. I'll continue test these issues in our
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #10 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-14
08:16:28 UTC ---
I released that I needed to add Yuri's patch to gcc-4.7.1.RC-20120606 as it had
not made it into the trunk. However, this still made no difference and I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #11 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-14
11:46:32 UTC ---
I've written half a dozen test harnesses this morning to tried to recreate this
bug unsuccessfully. My team writes very low-latency code so they do quite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2012-06-13
12:30:27 UTC ---
Paul,
I used April version of Linaro gcc toolchain so you may want to give it a try.
If it still doesn't work you'll probably need to attach a repro code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-13
14:28:54 UTC ---
4.7.1 is due out Real Soon Now, the release candidate can be found on any GNU
mirror:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #8 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-13
14:34:38 UTC ---
Cheers Jon, I'll try this afternoon...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #9 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-13
16:44:12 UTC ---
Unfortunately I still have this linking issue with gcc-4.7.1-RC-20120606 and
binutils-2.22 so I don't think it's a dup for PR 53572.
I'll try to make a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
Yuri Gribov tetra2005 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-06-07 15:50:56
UTC ---
I think it is a dup for PR 53572. Can you try patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53572#c3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604
--- Comment #2 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-07
17:14:13 UTC ---
The 4.7.0 code is different so the patch didn't work:
'struct varpool_node' has no member named 'symbol'
I'm not familiar with the gcc internals so I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo
