[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.3 |4.7.4 --- Comment #15 from Ric

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.2 |4.7.3 --- Comment #13 from Jaku

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #12 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-30 15:25:27 UTC --- reduced testcase for comment 7&8 regression as PR53821

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 12:43:03 UTC --- ok. II think somebody should start building boost and its test-suite with lto: many of these regressions are found "thanks" to boost after all… (I will when they move to cmake).

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-29 11:49:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > take back: (never do two updates at once) > in SOMETHING ELSE committed between > gcc version 4.7.2 20120615 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision 188650] > (GCC

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 10:45:05 UTC --- *** Bug 53337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 10:36:46 UTC --- take back: (never do two updates at once) in SOMETHING ELSE committed between gcc version 4.7.2 20120615 (prerelease) [gcc-4_7-branch revision 188650] (GCC) and gcc-4_7-branch re

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 07:25:35 UTC --- It HAS a side effect I observed also in 4.8 and had no time to reduce yet something pretty weird plenty of error: tmp/slc5_amd64_gcc470/src/FWCore/Modules/src/FWCoreModules/Multi

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-29 06:09:19 UTC --- the backport seems to work for my test cases. Side effects need to be verified

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-28 22:15:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > similar to PR53337 ? > and most probably also to PR53780 I backported revision 186252 to 4.7 on hjl/gcc-4_7-branch/pr53768 branch at http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=g

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-06-28 12:48:13 UTC --- similar to PR53337 ? and most probably also to PR53780

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-06-25 17:12:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Gold is fine BTW. It doesn't mean bfd ld shouldn't issue an error.

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-06-25 17:01:35 UTC --- Insofar as it only issues warnings: /tmp/cc4Lw5GR.ltrans1.ltrans.o:cc4Lw5GR.ltrans1.o:function vtable for boost::exception_detail::clone_impl > [clone .local.460]: warning: reloc

[Bug lto/53768] [4.7 Regression] Undefined references with boost 1.46/1.48/1.49

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53768 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot