http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka 2013-04-08
19:49:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 29830
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29830
Complette patchet
I am attaching patch to reduce renaming. It hits few can of worms, so I w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-16
13:18:51 UTC ---
Well, we slipped the 4.8 window :( But I will make the patch soon so it goes
into early 4.9 at least.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #14 from Andi Kleen 2012-10-25
14:20:31 UTC ---
Is there a chance to fix this in 4.8? What remains to be done?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-28
08:37:56 UTC ---
Ok, I give up ;) Honza, I think we should go with your patch to re-name
before LTO symtab merging as a first step, we can try improving later ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-27
12:46:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 28290
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28290
no-op patch
This tries to only delay renaming all statics, not avoid any renaming. Pas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28264|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
09:53:36 UTC ---
Indeed:
Index: gcc/lto-streamer-out.c
===
--- gcc/lto-streamer-out.c (revision 191694)
+++ gcc/lto-st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
09:38:44 UTC ---
Including the boundary as with
/* If there is a symbol in the set that shares the same
asm name than NODE, rename NODE. */
if (!TREE_PUBL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28215|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2012-09-19 08:23:45 UTC
---
> --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-18
> 14:20:45 UTC ---
> Created attachment 28215
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28215
> patch
>
> More complete p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27879|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-26
14:48:36 UTC ---
Created attachment 27879
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27879
incomplete prototype patch
Something like this. But I'll rather wait for the symtab reorg to rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot
18 matches
Mail list logo
