http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-05
11:48:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 5 11:48:27 2012
New Revision: 192120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192120
Log:
2012-10-05 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-05
10:11:25 UTC ---
Testing
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-live.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-live.c (revision 192114)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-live.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
16:43:37 UTC ---
Instead what happened is that I specifically restricted processing
DECL_DEBUG_EXPRs to local-vars in a previous fix. But it seems that
local vars no longer contains this dec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-10-04
16:38:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> No, look again - for some reason we skip debug stmts. That's obviously
> a bug. Eric - mind testing the "obvious" patch?
Err, misread the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
--- Comment #2 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04 16:33:00 UTC ---
I think in clear_unused_block_pointer, we already removed all block for debug
statements.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
