https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #8 from xuepeng guo ---
Author: xguo
Date: Tue Jul 29 07:11:02 2014
New Revision: 213147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213147&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/c-family/
2014-07-29 Terry Guo
Backport mainline r211832
2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #6 from Hale Wang ---
Thanks for Zhenqiang Chen's help. This bug is fixed. Refer to the link
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01429.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #5 from zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: zqchen
Date: Fri Jun 20 04:52:11 2014
New Revision: 211832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
c-family/ChangeLog
2014-06-20 Hale Wang
PR lto/61123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #4 from Hale Wang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> It seems that Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t is emitted from the C-family frontends only
> via config/arm/arm-c.c (as opposed to any other Tags). Probably because
> the option
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It seems that Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t is emitted from the C-family frontends only
via config/arm/arm-c.c (as opposed to any other Tags). Probably because
the option is c-family specific. This code needs to mov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #2 from Hale Wang ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> All ABI changing options should be also enabled for LTO and they also deserve
> handling in lto-opts.c (always stream, not only if explicitely set) and
> lto-wrapper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
