https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Jul 24 13:50:31 2014
New Revision: 212991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61802
* varasm.c (bss_initializer_p): Handle offlined ctor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > Yes, this fixes the failures on arm, will try aarch64 soon
>
> AArch64 seems to work fine too with this patch.
Thanks! I will double check it and commit then.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #10)
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 33177 [details]
> > Proposed patch
> >
> > I guess the problem is that error_mark_node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #9)
> Created attachment 33177 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> I guess the problem is that error_mark_node is special cased in varasm to
> send symbols to B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 33177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33177&action=edit
Proposed patch
I guess the problem is that error_mark_node is special cased in varasm to send
symbols to BSS for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #7)
> Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
> anchor generation
> not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually at the cauldron discussion I got an idea that it may be issue with
anchor generation
not bringing in all the constructors. Is the problem there that constructors of
static vairables
are empty in the fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is definitely a section issue:
.bss
.align 3
.LANCHOR0 = . + 0
.type buf, %object
.size buf, 10
buf:
.hword 1
.hword 4
.hword 16
.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3)
> how those tests fail?
They seem to hit abort ();
signal 6 in the emulator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
how those tests fail?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-none-elf|aarch64-none-elf, arm*
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There's actually quite a lot of -flto failures (all of them?) besides the ones
posted here all over the gcc testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto, wrong-code
Priority|P3
15 matches
Mail list logo
