[Bug lto/63607] run fail with -flto -mfloat-abi=softfp for armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2016-06-28 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/63607] run fail with -flto -mfloat-abi=softfp for armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2015-02-12 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug lto/63607] run fail with -flto -mfloat-abi=softfp for armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2015-01-16 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana

[Bug lto/63607] run fail with -flto -mfloat-abi=softfp for armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2014-10-23 Thread fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607 --- Comment #2 from Fei Yang fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) Is -mfloat-abi=softfp properly used at LTO stage? It seems that -mfloat-abi=softfp is here for lto1:

[Bug lto/63607] run fail with -flto -mfloat-abi=softfp for armeb-linux-gnueabi-gcc

2014-10-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63607 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code