https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
Unforutnately it is a bit difficult without Haswell machine. Would be possible
to profile it and post the difference in internal loops?
Possibly the target option node is not streamed fully and some flags are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #16 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Hi, Honza!
I still see that performance degradations for spec2006 tests. Could you please
check those on your side?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #15 from Igor Zamyatin ---
Just checked: everywhere "-Ofast -flto -funroll-loops -static -m64
-march=core-avx2" used (not -O3 as I mentioned before)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
do you use same flags at compile time and link time?
I did not see anything unusual at our testers, but perhaps some of the
optimization flags are streamed wrong?
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This breaks ada: ...
It is now pr64340.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
This breaks ada:
$ gcc/gnatmake --GCC=gcc/xgcc --GNATBIND=gcc/gnatbind --GNATLINK=gcc/gnatlink
-cargs -Bgcc/ -largs '--GCC=gcc/xgcc -Bgcc' -margs
--RTS=ia64-suse-linux/./libada -f ../gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 22:35:20 2014
New Revision: 218767
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218767&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/64043
* gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c: New testcase.
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 15 03:41:41 2014
New Revision: 218727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/64043
* tree.c (virtual_method_call_p): Return false when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
The following patch should help. Still need to work out why flag_devirtualize
is set at final link - it should not
Index: tree.c
===
--- tree.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
Now fails with the following backtrace. The location of the failure might have
changed due to the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg01076.html ; in any case,
currently the failure is:
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
*** Bug 64285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Actually my tree has flag_devirtualize marked as Optimization, as a separate
problem I need to figure out how it happens to be true.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64043
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
19 matches
Mail list logo
