[Bug lto/66014] 5.1 mingw64 fails to perform slim bootstrap-lto: ccEt8YNj.ltrans4.ltrans.o::(.text+0x628): undefined reference to `stpcpy'

2015-08-10 Thread breedlove.matt at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66014 --- Comment #3 from Matt Breedlove --- Created attachment 36166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36166&action=edit Patch to bypass sys_siglist and disable stpcpy builtin during bootstrap I'm currently using this patch which o

[Bug lto/66014] 5.1 mingw64 fails to perform slim bootstrap-lto: ccEt8YNj.ltrans4.ltrans.o::(.text+0x628): undefined reference to `stpcpy'

2015-07-09 Thread rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66014 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de --- Comment #

[Bug lto/66014] 5.1 mingw64 fails to perform slim bootstrap-lto: ccEt8YNj.ltrans4.ltrans.o::(.text+0x628): undefined reference to `stpcpy'

2015-05-10 Thread breedlove.matt at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66014 --- Comment #1 from Matt Breedlove --- This issue is still present on 5.1.0 and trunk. The issue seems to be related to libiberty's implementation of stpcpy being replaced with the GCC builtin and then causing linker errors due to that symbol no